Conservative Girls vs Feminist Girls

The most successful slave owner is one who can convince his slaves that their toil is honorable

There is much talk among men about how bad it is to be with a feminist, and many men seem to be drawn to women who are traditional or conservative.

For example, Rocco Casa at says the following:

Asian women are the most feminine in the world, both in terms of their beauty and family value. This encourages thousands of men to travel to Asia looking for qualities that have been lost in the west….

Can you imagine yourself living under the same roof with a western woman and sharing an entire house instead of just a bedroom?

You will probably need to go by her rules to be living “harmoniously.” Where does that leave you? Castrated. Even worse, a western woman will want to fool around much before she settles down, making her beloved feminist movement proud by being liberal and independent in her sexual choices. Plus, most western women smoke like a chimney, eat like a pig, drink alcohol like a sponge, and swear like truck drivers.

Would you marry such a woman? Hell no.

However, based on my experience, conservative girls have many problems compared to feminists.

Personally, I’d be very wary of traditional conservative women because they tend to believe that men must slave away at work while the lady stays at home and plays with the children and goes shopping.

Some men are fine with this. Some men are happy to work hard and financially support a loyal woman who stays at home and looks after the children, but in my opinion this arrangement is a sneaky way that men are tricked into becoming wage slaves.

Think about it carefully. In a traditional family, the woman stays at home, plays with the children, surfs the internet, and goes shopping while the man stresses at work. The man is called many great words, e.g. he is a “breadwinner.” However, in reality, the woman is using the man as a source of passive income. She is using him like a slave.

The most successful slave owner is one who can convince his slaves that their toil is honorable.

Even if a woman were loyal and looks after the children, I’d still be very hesitant about marriage because such an arrangement would result in multiple people dependent on me, and I’d likely have huge mortgage debt to pay, and debt is slavery!

The borrower is a slave to the lender. I’d rather be on the other side of the debt transaction, that is, I’d rather be the lender, not the borrower.

A slave owner (lender) has wealth flowing towards him whereas a slave (borrower) has wealth flowing from him.  

A housewife who sits back and collects cash from her breadwinner husband…would she be best categorized as a slave or a slave owner? Which way is the wealth flowing? Given that she is using her husband as an ATM, I’d suggest she is the slave owner.

I’d rather be retired by 35 and travelling the world rather than stuck in an office paying off a mountain of debt to fund the housewife lifestyle. Most men may disagree with me, but that is what I believe.

In Nazi Germany, some concentration camps had the sign Arbeit macht frei written on the entrance. This is translated into “work will set you free.”

The expression comes from the title of a novel by German philologist Lorenz Diefenbach, Arbeit macht frei: Erzählung von Lorenz Diefenbach (1873), in which gamblers and fraudsters find the path to virtue through labour….

The slogan “Arbeit macht frei” was placed at the entrances to a number of Nazi concentration camps. The slogan’s use in this instance was ordered by SS General Theodor Eicke, inspector of concentration camps and second commandant of Dachau Concentration Camp.

It is no surprise that throughout history, slave owners sought to convince their slaves that their slavery is honorable. If this were not the case, the slaves would revolt. Instead of whipping slaves and forcing them to work against their will, isn’t it much easier to convince the slaves to want to work?

“The greatest victory is that which requires no battle.”

~Sun Tzu, The Art of War

The reason why slavery based on capitalism is much more efficient than slavery based on chains and whips is because a slave motivated by greed is far more productive than a slave motivated by fear.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s